rhn
3
Thanks for the link. I don’t think I should follow that, since I don’t want to accuse anyone of copying without hard evidence. These guidelines assume that I’m certain about that fact.
The data is only available as tiles, so I can’t just compare lon/lat values and say “hey, it’s copied!”.
There are some hints - a few roads that are more like simple passages, invisible from satellite photos and not very visible on the spot, but they still could be done by somewhere else.
According to that wiki page, I should now send a polite email explaining them the situation, but should I send an email saying “Your data might have been copied from OSM”?