1

Hi, all.

Like many of you, I have used a lot of imagery capturing clients in the past, in order to contribute imagery to OSM, to improve editing. I think I’m currently on my sixth client, and I have imagery scattered everywhere. I’m putting a small table together to compare the different aspects of the clients, which I will aim to publish on the OSM Wiki. If this is of interest to you, can I ask you to have a look at the following link (G/ Google Drive)

Once I have enough information, i’ll add this table to a suitable place on the wiki, so that future contributors can easily understand the pros and cons of using a particular client.

If you can add any initial information to this table, please do, and i’ll do the same. In case anyone is wondering, I think that Panoramax has a lot of potential, but it’s still in early development.

Thanks,

Chris
chris_debian

1 Like
2

Just a small note: it may be helpful to retitle this thread to say “Mobile Imagery Capture Clients” instead of “Mobile Mapping Clients”. I am interested in both categories, but was expecting something different when I opened this thread! :smile:

4 Likes
3

Very good point; post title amended.

Thanks,

Chris.

1 Like
4

You have a column labeled “Is captured imagery made available to OSM, to improve the map?” Does that mean apps that don’t do this are in scope/ what is scope? Private image capture apps that are useful for personal mapping?

1 Like
5

There is already a small article making a comparison on the OpenStreetMap Wiki. Below is the link

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street-level_imagery_services

2 Likes
6

Thanks for this, @BrechtD . I was aware of this table, and my work was intended to augment it. I’m now wondering whether I may just amend that table, rather than create a new one, which may confuse people.

I’ll look at both tables and see what the options are.

Thanks and sorry for the delayed reply (family funerals).

Chris.