Pedja
(Pedja)
6
This is fundamentally wrong approach.
This forum would be used (as old one) as verz valuable archive of inforamtion. Main requirement for the archive is that is is searchable in best possible manner, and there is no best way to expose its content than allowing search engines to understand content and proesent it to those that look for such content.
Exactly. What is more consistent and predictable than to use group name as slug in URL?
That is just technical decision that has no usability value.
This platform uses topic names to create slughs in UIRLâs. That works fine and exaclty as it should. Same should be with categories. Actually, it from SEO point of view, would be even better if post URL contains also category slug in it. That would allow search engines to understand a structure and provide better results on search queries.
That provides the best experience for users. When they are looking to solve an issue or learn something, they should be pointed to this forum by search engines, if proper answer lays here.
SEO optimization serves exactly that purpose. That is why URLs should not use cryptic and non-recognizable slugs but proper keywords that search engines can collect, understand and use to provide information behind URLs to people who search for them.
And if people got directed by search engines here they would possibly learn that this platform exists, find this platform useful, maybe decide to join, became member o community and thus make community better.
One of the odd sides of OSM is that it acts like closed community. It is hard for new people to join in as it is hard to start learning about it. Not that OSM is just complicated by definition, but finding answers is hard. We should do everything we can to make it more accessible to new people, not to hide from them.