referred to DWG as Ticket#2026010810000051 for now as undiscussed import with unknown license (and bad tagging, but it is least problem here)
not sure is it qualifying for DWG report
referred to DWG as Ticket#2026010810000051 for now as undiscussed import with unknown license (and bad tagging, but it is least problem here)
not sure is it qualifying for DWG report
what about Bot edit proposal: remove amenity=office where it duplicates existing office= tagging - #13 by Mateusz_Konieczny ?
(maybe you consider that more should be done and I will handle first at least this mildly related import*, but it was definitely not addressed at all)
*adds amenity=office without office= tags - so would not be edited by this proposed edit at all