Boarders/Relations/admin_levels Poland // gmina Chojna

Dear Polish,

I’ve a question regarding Granice_obwodow_spisowych and Granice_obrebow_ewidencyjnych … are these valid relation and/or Administration sources?
Also
Granice_jednostek_ewidencyjnych
Granice_obrebow_ewidencyjnych
Granice_rejonow_statystycznych

Concrete example would be the following relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74373081

Thanks for your opinions/discussions/informations (especially how to fix the the nominatim part).

Obwód spisowy = Census enumeration area https://stat.gov.pl/en/metainformations/glossary/terms-used-in-official-statistics/830,term.html
Obręb geodezyjny (ewidencyjny) = Geodesic precinct https://stat.gov.pl/en/metainformations/glossary/terms-used-in-official-statistics/1738,term.html

As you can see, these are not administrative units. So in my opinion they are useless for OSM.

All administrative boundaries in Poland are listed here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Poland/Podzia%C5%82_administracyjny#Tworzenie_granic_administracyjnych

Some examples, why I would prefer relations there:
“suburb”:“Błądzim”,“village”:“Grabowo”,“county”:“gmina Chojna”,“state”:“West Pomeranian Voivodeship”
“suburb”:“Błądzim”,“village”:“Krzymów”,“county”:“gmina Chojna”,“state”:“West Pomeranian Voivodeship”
“suburb”:“Błądzim”,“village”:“Krzymów”,“county”:“gmina Chojna”,“state”:“West Pomeranian Voivodeship”

“neighbourhood”:“Krupin”,“suburb”:“Rurczyna”,“village”:“Wilkoszyce”,“county”:“gmina Chojna”,“state”:“West Pomeranian Voivodeship”

We probably all prefer relation because of Nominatim but it’s not always that easy.

Since the shot down of the polish EMUiA (places & addresses record) version 1 (somewhere in 2017) the official administrative borders go as far as to the level of gmina (commune/Gemeinde). As far as I know beyond that there are no official administrative borders, so pio2_122 is right saying Obręb geodezyjny (ewidencyjny) is - de iura - not an administrative unit. But, on the other hand…
In many cases Obręb geodezyjny (ewidencyjny) are consistent with the - de facto - borders of places (villages), where one Obręb geodezyjny is one village. That is for example the case in the commune where I live=> they exactly match the pattern of addresses and even with road signs when driving from one place to another. So, they are present in OSM as borders with admin_level=8 even though they are not official, because if something does function as a border, it is a border.
If you take a look on Lower Silesian Voivodeship (a province there 100% of villages have borders) you’ll notice villages are mostly based on Obręb geodezyjny.
But, in the commune neighbouring to mine one Obręb geodezyjny covers two villages and in this case - they are in fact - as pio2_122 writes - useless for OSM.
So no easy & obvious conclusions.
In the case of gmina Chojna I checked every Obręb geodezyjny and the place (village) within them, in the National Register of Geograhical Names (PRNG).
As far as I can see, one place=village matches one Obręb geodezyjny. Other places (hamlets, isolated dwellings) are sub-parts of villages, so in this particular case - in my opinion - Obręb geodezyjny can be used as relations for borders.