SomeoneElse
(Andy Townsend)
18
I think that one of those linked contributions was in the last 5 days. Looking at the changeset history of each, I think that they’re all somewhat local - they don’t seem to be “HOT mappers” in the sense that they’re contributing to HOT projects all over the world. There certainly were issues by HOT mappers until the tasks were made invisible - with a DWG hat on I’ve had quite a long conversation with one of those, explaining why a “quality rather than quantity” approach is better for OSM.
Clearly yes, by you
- and that’s the way that that OSM has always worked. I suspect that the creator of these tasks has perhaps underestimated how much they’d have to check on the quality of some of the contributions. Some HOT contributors actually think it’s OK to add poor-quality data (especially after a humanitarian emergency) because they overestimate the value of what they’re adding.
Something like natural:en is just a typing error, as is (assuming the mapping is by someone local) “Byrn-glas”. In that case I’d just say “hello and welcome” on a changeset discussion comment, and ask whether the name really is “Byrn-glas”, given that they’ve already added the Welsh name as the expected “Bryn-glas”. That mapper’s been active for a month; there has been no communication by changeset comments.
The “holiday let” mapper, who’s been mapping for 3 months, hasn’t had the problem explained to them (and to be honest, mapping of these is a bit complicated - I’d have to look at taginfo to check the most popular tagging).
1 Like