There is no visualisation on the OSM.org map for amenity=studio?
Not even a purple point to indicate a business?
Node: Plug the Jack (12531974770) | OpenStreetMap
See this GitHub issue, especially the very last post: Render amenity=studio · Issue #2518 · gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto · GitHub
Add office=company if it the studio is operated as a business and that will render a dot with it’s name. Adding this to a business is not tagging for the renderer as it is an expected tag if it is a company.
I don’t have a problem with =studio
+ studio=
per se, but it’s not quite sufficient alone. They need to distinguish between these rent-out studios, and ones dedicated to a creator/channel/“studio” franchise.
access=
: Doesn’t work because that’s not the exact meaning, not really used for this on other similar features, and might be used to show whether a “private” facility allows visitorsstudio=
: Not sure how it works in music (can you assume all=audio
be publicly usable? Also=music
may be needed when not designed for podcasts or dubbing/voiceover/narration), butstudio=video
has a problem. Even ignoring the existing definition (movies only?), it doesn’t distinguish between usually “private” or company-only large open space spanning studios, and such small room or booth scale studios freely usable by the public individually or in small groups. Then it has an overlap with=television
, when TV shows aren’t required to be recorded in studios capable of live broadcast. Talk:Tag:amenity=studio - OpenStreetMap Wikirental=
/service:*:rental=
???
What do you mean?
If something is lacking on OSM.org I add so that is rendered like other usual things for the public.
The “standard” map on osm.org isn’t a very good representation of the data within OpenStreetMap. It only shows a very limited subset of what is there.
Partly this is for a good reason - a map that showed everything would become cluttered very quickly. Lots of other maps use OSM data and I can certainly think of map styles that would show your data. Have you looked at the other map styles on osm.org itself? It might even be visible on one of those.