Thank you for the clarification, but this response confirms the concerns I raised.
The issue is not disagreement. It is the repeated pattern of belittling tone, misrepresentation, and deflection. Reframing those concerns as me being resistant to complexity or misreading quotes is not helpful. It avoids taking responsibility and shifts the burden of tone and clarity entirely onto me, despite a long thread in which I have remained constructive and direct.
You may claim to be helping, but the cumulative effect of your responses has been discouraging, dismissive, and, at times, condescending. That includes language like “sigh,” referring to contributions as equivalent to “J Random User,” and repeatedly positioning your views as inherently more valid or informed.
You are welcome to disagree with the structure or use case I am proposing. That is normal and expected. But doing so while disregarding basic respect and good faith engagement is not appropriate, especially from a moderator.
At this point, I will not continue this exchange. I will focus my energy on working with those who are able to engage respectfully and collaboratively.